Nothing better than ACDSee

What are the best aspects of this product?

When it comes to image processing software for PCs, I don't think there's anything better than ACDSee. It's a standalone software that works fast and is also comprehensive and intuitive. It has only improved over time and remains the software that I use the most often. With ACDSee, I don't have to look around for the adjustments that I need since everything is easy to locate with no hidden sub-menus to go through. When it comes to working with RAW images, outputs are always well-rendered and smooth, and I don't think any other software can compete. I also appreciate how the implementation of color adjustments and tone is so comprehensive. Profile making is also easy. I think other users will also be happy with the additional functions that come with integrations with other programs like Topaz, Paint.net, Neat-image, and Portrait-pro.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

I think it would be a great improvement if they had better coverage of lenses from first part manufacturers. For instance, the biggest miss is with Sony hardware. This is a big problem for people like me who shoot with hardware like the Sony A7r3 and 4, most with Zeiss and Sony glass. It is also disappointing that this oversight has happened since from what I know, the programming community can freely access the lens profiles made by Sony.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Thanks to this program, my workflow has improved immensely

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes