Adobe Muse CC Review

PROS: An awesome aspect of making a site through this program is that using it has never been this easy. It's essentially a plaform for both both novice and professional users. I'm using Muse to build sites quickly. They would end up looking fantastic and handy. The greatest thing with its is that you can modify and make changes easily.

CONS: Initially, it was dealing with three kinds of sites. Usually: smartphone, tablet, and desktop PC. This time though, it's hard to know exactly where to add in the breaking points. Especially with the latest update. The previous one was a whole lot better.

PROS: It's relatively simple to utilize. Knowledge with coding is unecessary. Workplace is strikingly similar to its Adobe Suite platforms. It's simple making websites that are responsive. Adobe is frequently updating it and making enhancements on its functionality.

CONS: I'd like it if more options were available. By that I mean options for forums. Another is to have additional choices in adding an e-commerce.

PROS: I've been waiting to be a graphic designer for quite some time now. Having a precise design in spewing code without doing anything at all is a dream for any designer. This is also beneficial for those who haven't really dabbed into advanced coding. You won't have to worry much about anything. The program does just about everything for you.

CONS: One issue with this program is part of what I favor about it. Muse does a majority of the lifting. But it comes with a serious cost. And that's in the form of heavy code. Efficiency is not the kind of thing you'd see it spit out.

PROS: I have a backgroun in graphic design. I'm usually a visual individual. What attracted me with Muse is its ease of use. When I initially opened Muse, I was concerned that I'd have a hard time comprehending the interface. But due to it being an Adobe product, it's basically like any other program within its suite. Navigating around it was surprisingly easy.

CONS: I wouldn't mention it as something I'd hate with the program. I knew right from the start how Muse has the ability to do things. It's one reason why I'm thinking of using it over WordPress, Wix, or any website builder available.

PROS: A practical software. Even if you have no idea on how to code, you can still put up your own site. If you have knowledge being an illustrator or as indesign, then it's similar to each other. That means using it is really easy. You get to see how your site looks when viewed in mobile devices and in a computer.

CONS: I love using this software. Right now, I have no idea what I dislike about it. I feel that if you've got years of experience with code and wanted a way to be innovative in web design, then I feel this program won't be useful.

PROS: Muse contains certain perks such as a structure design that's a lot intuitive and animation that can easily be handled for an html element. Responsive dsign is the biggest upside of the previous release. It gives you the chance to create sites without dabbing into frameworks and media queries. Since Adobe brought in this functionality, it ended up becoming my personal favorite. One primary reason why I lik Muse is its Edge Animate integration.

CONS: Muse isn't as integrated completely with Business Catalyst. I feel this is its biggest downside. Getting use to Integrate with some CMS will still entail some dirty work with code. As a site developer/designer, I've dealt with a lot of WordPress stuff. There's no functionality in Muse that can allow you to accomplish these things easily. From time to time, the WYSIWYG won't reach your requests in code.

PROS: Adobe Muse functions similarly to that of Adobe InDesign when it comes to the user interface. Setting up master pages was a breeze. Defining text/paragraph and graphics is simple and can be reused. Such setup can lead you to swiftly carry out changes to a current design. The best aspect with Muse is its footer as you can clearly define a place under every page resulting to it "flowing" under the content.

CONS: Graphic styling could use further flexibility when saving states. It'd be a big help if the FTP settings can be handled and saved for varying projects. Webfront needs to be project-specific. It shouldn't be defined globally. At times, performance needs to be a bit better. Huge docs significantly slows everything to a crawl.

PROS: What I find pleasing with Adobe Muse is how it was able to open up the site creating world to visual designers without diving into complex code/programming. The UI is simple to utilize. It's easier for those who already have a clue on other related products. These include individuals who are previously aware of products such as Illustrator or Adobe InDesign. Adpbe also comes with helpful videos to ease learning curves along the way.

CONS: The one aspect that I hate with the software is the updates it's being issued yearly. This is due to the fact that it's new in the market. It's actually a good thing in expanding its functionality and other capabilities. Thing is, getting updates frequently will push you to look into sites made before to check whether or not the code/functionality are still doing what they're supposed to.

PROS: Being a graphic designer without any previous experience in web design, I liked how everything is familiar with Adobe Muse in terms of its UI. Using it gave it a close-to-InDesign feel. Thus, making it a lot simpler to long-time Adobe users in getting a hands on Muse. Being able to lay out a bunch of things, organizing layers, and defining paragraph styles are some of the program's strengths.

CONS: At times it can challenging to carry out advanced tactics like parallax scrolling. While switching the effect can easily be done (as a result of the its intuitive UI), trying to get objects to slide in a certain manner at a specific time can be confusing. It's worse for those who want to try deciphering the "start" and "end" vlaues influencing the page.