Nothing is above this software.

What are the best aspects of this product?

Adobe Muse functions similarly to that of Adobe InDesign when it comes to the user interface. Setting up master pages was a breeze. Defining text/paragraph and graphics is simple and can be reused. Such setup can lead you to swiftly carry out changes to a current design. The best aspect with Muse is its footer as you can clearly define a place under every page resulting to it "flowing" under the content.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

Graphic styling could use further flexibility when saving states. It'd be a big help if the FTP settings can be handled and saved for varying projects. Webfront needs to be project-specific. It shouldn't be defined globally. At times, performance needs to be a bit better. Huge docs significantly slows everything to a crawl.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

I've been misuising Adobe Muse to work on wireframes and HiFi-Mockups of web designing. These are usually for e-stores, business sites, and newsletters. This greatly assisted our company in presenting designs for clients. It's also an internal status quo for our team and software developers.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes