MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Autodesk PLM 360
User review of Autodesk PLM 360

A good way to check whether essential requirements are present within the final product

- by Victoria

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
5 out of 7
Quite likely
COST EFFICENCY
5out of 7
Good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Centrally-located information and easy access for everyone are only the initial benefits of using this software. As time goes, you'll notice some serious improvements, especially in regard to dependent relationships between critical items.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

It is not as fast as I expected it to be, and I've noticed certain irregularities with group cetification. Sometimes, the templates are so bad that I want to switch back to standard engineering. We tried updating the group code, but it was so difficult that we started wondering whether we really needed the program (especially in terms of document flows).

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Personally, I am connecting DO-160 qualification requirements to PLM's testing system, which is necessary in order to certify a product. I really hold on a straightforward connection between the final deliverables and requirements, and such can easily get lost without a program to organize the chaos of people, preferences, and complicated deadlines.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

1-3 years

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Aviation & Aerospace

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

several employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.