MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of CARTO
User review of CARTO

It’s impressive! User-friendly that delivers fast results!

- by Oliver

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
5out of 7
Good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I really liked Carto. It made studying how to apply spatial analysis very simple. It feels like it's made from the point of view of someone without data or spatial analysis skills. I even learned SQL from Carto and some CSS and HTML using its builder interface. It obviously doesn't substitute the actual technical foundation in data analysis and GIS but without Carto, it'd be very hard for me to understand it. It's user-friendly and aesthetic.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

I think things can be changed in the GUI. Like having limited user-dependent layers and sometimes with style labels/tooltips — It can also be a bit clunky. It would have been nice if it's not so limited. The community of people who knows how to use Carto was small. Also, finding stuff can be challenging if you don't know where to start. It's a good thing that the customer support is responsive really quickly as there are occasions when some mapping analysis is needed asap.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We mainly used it to display the data in a spatial format. Quite often, viewing something as a symbol on the map rather than seeing a whole data sets makes all the difference. Also, I'd love to have an option to link it to Tableau, as we're aiming to use it for its usability. Carto certainly has an edge than Tableau in design and versatility so to combine these two would be really awesome!

Are you a current user of this product?

No

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

1-10 Employees

What is your industry?

Commercial Real Estate

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.