MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of ArcGIS CityEngine
User review of ArcGIS CityEngine

Can be used for so many projects.

- by Tyra

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
5 out of 7
Quite likely
COST EFFICENCY
4out of 7
Acceptable
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
3out of 5
ok
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3out of 5
ok

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I think that the color and graphics are two elements worth noting with CityEngine. This program can easily process and work with more complicated algorithms on colors. And the best part? All of this translates well in 3D visuals. When I’m not too happy about the outcome of the rendering, I can easily take it to ArcMap to do the necessary adjustments too.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

CityEngine not only has software support but hardware too. However, hardware can be very pricey when it comes to CityEngine. Some of our clients have a hard time paying for it.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We use CityEngine mostly for planning and redirecting pipes and tunnels on the campus. This works well for us for now. However, because CityEngine is a very powerful tool, we hope to design and implement other projects too.

Are you a current user of this product?

No

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Higher Education

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.