Serving tons of images for us

What are the best aspects of this product?

My blog site has more than a couple of thousand images. Half of those are served by ImageKit, while the other is by a different image management tool. They both excel in terms of high speed and image quality. Thing is, the other platform takes more than 2GB of memory space, while ImageKit only takes 110MB.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

I can’t think of any downside in ImageKit. In fact, I’m surely using this for more images on my blog!

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

ImageKit is very helpful for my blogging site that contains thousands of images. I cannot store such images locally, since that would pull down the loading speed of the blog. Thankfully, ImageKit has a high-speed content delivery network; meaning, the images load quickly even when on a sluggish connection.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes