MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Microsoft Visual Studio
User review of Microsoft Visual Studio

Intended for developers.

- by Douglas

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

In own personal opinion, Visual Studio happens to be a top-of-the-line IDE. It's the latest in C#, .NET, and Visual Basic development for the Windows OS. Some versions are free while others come with an MSDN subscription. These days there are variants that run on both Mac OS and Linux. Microsoft is doing so much today that also includes the ability to run on products that don't run Microsoft.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

It's a bit costly if a portion of your business involves only Windows development. From my perspective, other tools are available for web development if you happen to not be utilizing .NET. The Team Foundation Version is getting a bad reputation for not living up to its ability as the rest seen within Visual Studio.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

C# is great for general purpose language. We're using Visual Studio in developing new software within C#. We're also using it in supportng legacy C#, legacy ASP, and ASP.NET. Visual Studio happens to be highly effective in such scenarios. As a matter of fact, our team members are also using it in developing web pages.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

1-3 years

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Computer Software

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

most employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.