MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Paperless Proposal
User review of Paperless Proposal

Writing proposals.

- by Ken

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Being able to come up with a library of frequently used templates and docs. The Paperless team can make customizations of them with client name merge fields, which prove to be handy. It's a big hellp in making customized proposals quickly in an organized manner. In addition, I prefer having the ability in viewing projects under a single manageable screen in tracking the pending projects.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

Certain finalization stages can be enhanced and modified for specific uses. At times, customers are in need of a format leading to added PDF editing after it's been downloaded. Maybe this should be an added functionality in helping out in the stage of completion.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Through Paperless, we can ensure our proposals come out in a uniform fashion for presentation. This aids in creating consistency that my business can greatly benefit from. It enables us to control in managing how our company can be looked at. The main aim is to generate a proposal in CA to appear exactly the same as the one completed in NY.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 month

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Security and Investigation

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

all employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.