MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Retrace
User review of Retrace

A simple approach in eradicating logging management.

- by Dan

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

There's so much to appreciate with Retrace. For its pricing, it's simple to handle. It has decent documentation in being integrated to any business application. Comes with standard-logging-frameworks support. It can be deployed as a normal logger. Its Error-View functionality is frequently used in seeking, reviewing, and monitoring bugs.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

The web-based app performance isn't great all the time. This is true if you're swapping filters within the log view. Take note, this isn't a deal breaker. But at times, it can be a nuisance.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We've been making use of Stackify to see possible bad behavior within our own software. We also use it to enhance performance for the our support. A majority of tickets coming our way can be resolved or, at the very least, be linked to our Stackify trace/error logs. With Stackify offering support for diagnostic contexts, it's a lot simpler for filtering logs by customer/level. We can also retrieve meta-data regarding the log context.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 month

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

1-10 Employees

What is your industry?

Unavailable

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

all employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.