MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Ryver
User review of Ryver

Efficient management tool with frequent updates

- by Bernardo

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
5 out of 7
Quite likely
COST EFFICENCY
4out of 7
Acceptable
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
3out of 5
ok
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3out of 5
ok

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Since our company has begun using Ryver, we’ve experienced great improvements with our communication, and it is easier to create and assign team projects through this platform. The report feature is wonderful because it carries all info I need to work with; thus, long and tedious reporting processes are now unnecessary. Moreover, it receives frequent updates each month that boosts the platform, and it is backed with a professional user support team that helps me every time a problem takes place. The choice of using Ryver is really a big leap for our business in terms of planning and other processes, and it is great that I use it in my office.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

I take a long time to download files for reporting since I need to grab them individually and I usually need to deal with more than 10 documents. Also, I am having a hard time in personalizing the platform, so features that I frequently use appear first on the dashboard. I hope there are efficient options for this.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Highly automated, receives updates every so often, and its developers actually listen to user suggestions for further boosting the platform. It has a free trial version where you can try all its features, and it comes with affordable prices when you want to buy it for good. I’m reaping excellent results since I have started using Ryver.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

N/A

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.