MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of TeamGantt
User review of TeamGantt

A visually appealing tool intended for planning projects and with dependencies.

- by Kathy

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Great visual UI and dependencies. The visual aesthetic is simple and contains more than one possibilities when it comes to formatting. Highly useful in assigning individuals, hours, and inclusiong of comments for certain tasks. We picked TeamGantt since since we've already started to plan for a highly complex project with tasks and dependecies that are overlapping each other.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

We were in need of planning a complex project with more than a hundred tasks within a 10-year period. It was hard with the platform we're dealing with now. It limits things only to days and hours. Not so much in terms of years and months.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We're using TeamGantt for planning and doing follow-ups on the schedule of highly complex projects over the next several months. The possibility in using varying colors and filtering those colors have been a big help. The same goes for making tasks by means of groups and subgroups. The visual UI is clear and does it in a visually appealing manner for each project.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 year

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

1-10 Employees

What is your industry?

Management Consulting

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

most employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.