MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Textura
User review of Textura

Overly Complicated For Anyone But Large Companies

- by Thomas Burke

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
2 out of 7
Very unlikely
COST EFFICENCY
1out of 7
Awful
OVERALL IMPRESSION
3out of 5
ok
EASE OF USE
1out of 5
very poor
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
2out of 5
mediocre

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

It looks like if you are an accountant that could spend lots of time on it, it might be a pretty good system.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

Way too complicated for small subcontractors that do not have full time accounting staff. I have spent more time in Textura trying to get paid than i have on the project itself.

What features/services would you like to see in future versions of this product?

Simplify, Simplify, Simplify.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

No problems were solved, but lots of problems were created. We have been working for six months, but have not gotten paid yet.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 year

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

1-10 Employees

What is your industry?

Civil Engineering

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How did your company implement this product?

in the cloud

How many people in your company actively use this product?

just me

FEATURE DETAILS

Construction Management

Change Orders
1
very poor
Document Control
1
very poor
Purchase Orders
1
very poor
Submittals
1
very poor

Platform

Performance and Reliability
3
ok
Support
3
ok