MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Transifex
User review of Transifex

Reliable customer support and great synchronization with WP and Github

- by Dewayne

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
6 out of 7
Very likely
COST EFFICENCY
4out of 7
Acceptable
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
3out of 5
ok
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3out of 5
ok

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Our website is hosted by WordPress and we like how Transifex can integrate with that platform, making it easier for us to upload the localized content. Though our translators are still fumbling around the live editing function of the app, other areas are proceeding smoothly. Even our developers enjoy the integration with Github because it streamlines the push of strings with just a few code lines.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

String-level segmentation is not as efficient as we want it to be. It would be nice if Transifex adds the sentence-level segmentation in the future. And I would like to offer another suggestion: Transifex can make the quality assessment flow more comprehensive because it cannot detect extra spaces well.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Our organization uses Transifex for many projects like website, knowledgebase, and more because of its seamless integrations with different systems.

Are you a current user of this product?

No

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

1-10 Employees

What is your industry?

N/A

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.