MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Veeam
User review of Veeam

Nothing compares

- by Kaleigh

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
6 out of 7
Very likely
COST EFFICENCY
4out of 7
Acceptable
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
3out of 5
ok
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Our organization was already using a tool for backup, but it was for our physical machines and not for our virtual ones. We got this tool specifically for that purpose and I can say that it has been a good decision on our part. I haven't encountered any difficulty when it comes to using it. No files have ended up corrupted or lost. That's really something more people should appreciate since it's happened quite a number of times with previous tools I've used. I was also very impressed with the recovery feature for VMs, since it basically allowed me to come up with a VM from just a backup point.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

There are a couple of things that I think can be improved. I've always encountered a bottleneck when it comes to NAS boxzes, and I think if I could back up the same NAS with physical machines everything will be finished at a faster rate. The other thing I've had a problem with is not having certain folders be included in a backup. If there is a way to do that, I haven't figured it out. I'd like to see improvements with regards to these two things in future versions of this tool.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Thanks to this too, data recovery in our organization is now simplified. We can perform full and incremental daily backups, and can even schedule it based on the workload. The copies we make can be stored either in the cloud or in secondary storage. This tool really is quite exceptional.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

51-100 Employees

What is your industry?

N/A

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.