MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of WebMethods
User review of WebMethods

Not good for smaller projects

- by Nichole

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
5 out of 7
Quite likely
COST EFFICENCY
5out of 7
Good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
3out of 5
ok
EASE OF USE
3out of 5
ok
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3out of 5
ok

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

The best part about this app is that it is easy to share data between multiple software applications and exchange messages. With its fully formed IDE, you get access to everything you need to accomplish this. Nevertheless, there is a bit of learning you need to work with this app. I have worked with a team of students who were trying to use webMethods and there was some difficulty at the beginning. Despite that I have had positive experience with webMethods.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

There a couple of disadvantages. First, we don’t like the way the IDE was setup. Second, although most of the features were transparent, some of the features that we wanted seemed to be hidden in the complex interface. Third, we did not get adequate support when we ran into issues and it was difficult to get help.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We use the app for on-premise data integration. It is useful to integrate software and try to eliminate extra overhead whether or not it is successful.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 month

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Higher Education

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

Did your company use a different software before this one?

no

How many people in your company actively use this product?

just me

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.

Share
Tweet
Share