MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Attensity
User review of Attensity

Great tool for analyzing customer experience

- by Melanie

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
6 out of 7
Very likely
COST EFFICENCY
6out of 7
Very good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I feel Attensity’s main advantage is I can personalize queries and categories to find what is crucial for our business. I can use both structured and unstructured fields together for deeper analysis. The app gives me the ability to analyze multiple data sources into a single topic of analysis. Another plus point is the support team offers prompt and helpful service to resolve all issues.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

There are a few drawbacks I would like to point out. To get the best analysis, you need to do manual categorization and this takes plenty of time. Second, the app is not user-friendly and you have to invest a lot of time to learn to create and manipulate queries. Third, the pricing packages are expensive.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We are using the Attensity’s text analytics to find customer insight every day. We realized that we needed to make changes in a few of our airports and inflight products, and improve our processes. We also realize that even small changes made from text analytics can have a big impact on NPS.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 year

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Airlines/Aviation

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

most employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.