MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Microsoft System Center
User review of Microsoft System Center

A huge fan of this amazing product!

- by Hazel

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

When it Microsft services and applications monitoring, there's nothing that's as robust and flexible than SCM. It has great integration and meshes well with other MS-based products (custom and OOB). Installation, configuration, and administration is seamless. There are solutions in the market, yet I've remained loyal to this product for a long while now. I still love how their tools and features work.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

There's a tendency to run into a continuous learning curve since it almost always changes. A majority of the changes are typically seen within the user interface. For the most part, the learning curve is small. Aside from this minor gripe, there's really nothing else bad with this product.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

Its Systems Center is being used for carrying out and looking into Windows workstations. It tracks both Linux and Windows servers. Its overhead has minimal management. Basically, it gave us room in deploying an active model for sniffing out problems. We're able to look into matters with less downtime.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 month

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Information Technology

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

all employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.