MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Octiv
User review of Octiv

Used with Tinderbox for managing proposals.

- by Pauline

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
6 out of 7
Very likely
COST EFFICENCY
6out of 7
Very good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I like the assets concept within Tinderbozx. Assets contains content and texts that can be revised and utilized by means of draggin and dropping the asset in the doc.Before, we had content pieces for proposals that have been stash just about everywhere. Tbis makes it hard to seek out updated content. Tinderbox assets fosters a single authoritative source when it comes to proposal content.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

Certain WYSIWYG editor tools won't behave like you'd expect when exporting the doc as a Word or PDF file. Just about everything functions reasonably well when proposals are in web-view. Thing is, our response to bids would entail a submision of a Word or PDF file. I can spot workarounds for problems that we've run into.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

I love making use of assets in the creation of proposals. It saved me a great deal of time. It lets me utilizea single authoritative source for my proposal content. If it happens to be within Tinnderbox, then the content is usually the latest. It kept our messaging constant in all proposals.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 year

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Computer Software

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

most employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.