MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of PeopleSoft
User review of PeopleSoft

Very effective HRIS analyst for our payroll

- by Horace

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
6 out of 7
Very likely
COST EFFICENCY
6out of 7
Very good
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I think that the capacity for drawing, slicing and manipulating data is awesome, and so is the online balancing. Using the program made me realise there is no comparable tool on the market, and I was happy to find out the dev team is constantly working on improvements. The customization is impressive too, especially due to the new features they are introducing all the time.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

People I consulted prior to choosing PeopleSoft told me it is outdated, and now I think I know why: it's hard to keep pace with cobol and batch processing, and I'd really like to have a simplified payroll process, a checkbox, for instance. You may think this is not important, but following the steps in the process of a 5-page Excel document can really be a nightmare.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

I love the automatic generation of reports, I think that's most important for payroll software. Excel data is automated to CI, meaning we are taking full advantage of automation enhancements (and there are plenty of them!). We’d like to see Oracle improving even more in this direction.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 month

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Hospital and Health Care

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

most employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.