MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of Replicon
User review of Replicon

The best project cost accounting and tracking tool

- by Joyce

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
4out of 5
very good
EASE OF USE
4out of 5
very good
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4out of 5
very good

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

It provides a simple interface where users can utilize the tool to track time in projects. It allows me to apportion each task time or hours. Users can comment on the hours allocated which helps to check in on those comments and evaluate their relevance to the objectives of the entire project. If the comments are not material, then I can ignore them without affecting the outcome of the project.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

When the pay period goes to the next month, it takes time to refresh the screen so that you can see the entire pay period. This can be annoying although a minor issue. The calendar layout may be made better to help bring about three months period on a single screen. This would help when you want to review the timesheets of the previous pay period.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We are now able to create cost accounting database to track on the cost an entire project will incur to complete. It helps us to track costs based on the labor required and know which areas to improve that have the most returns in the project.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I use it myself

How long have you been using this product?

1-3 years

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Information Technology and Services

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

all employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

Less than 1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.