MENU
GET LISTED
GET LISTED
SHOW ALLPOPULAR CATEGORIES
Logo of QuickBooks Time
User review of QuickBooks Time

A customer service event that’s nothing but agreeable.

- by Josh

USER SATISFACTION

RECOMMENDATION
7 out of 7
Definitely
COST EFFICENCY
7out of 7
Superb
OVERALL IMPRESSION
5out of 5
amazing
EASE OF USE
5out of 5
amazing
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5out of 5
amazing

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

We played around with other online products offering DCAA compliance while linking to Quickbooks. So far, TSheets ended becoming the best option. It provided flexibility in how we can improve our business. A favorite for our hardworking employees. Customer service was utilized in a couple scenarios.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

We prefer using the manual timesheet. However, Android/iOS apps doesn't really support this functionality. We'd prfer having mobile apps to offer improved support and a manual timesheet. A few enhancements should be kept in mind. This includes being able to assign service on a per-member basis instead of the typical per-customer basis.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We're scientists so we usually handle a number of projects simultaneously. We frequently move from one project to the next in a single day. Each project is supported by the government. The main goal is meeting government reporting and time keeping needs while getting our scientists as much as flexibility as possible. TSheets does just that.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

USER DETAILS

What is your role with this product?

  • I manage other people who use it

How long have you been using this product?

Less than 1 year

COMPANY DETAILS

What is your company size?

More than 100 Employees

What is your industry?

Research

USAGE & IMPLEMENTATION

How many people in your company actively use this product?

all employees

PRICING & COSTS

How long is your contract with the vendor?

1 year

FEATURE DETAILS

No information provided by the reviewer.