ActiveBatch Review

PROS: Using and repeat jobs relatively quickly once you get familiar. Flexible, with plenty of integration possibilities with other frameworks, platforms, and scripting languages. Jobs can be planned, triggered, and much more. The company is structured, and it is equally seamless and safe to install and upgrade.

CONS: Must start with a slight learning curve, not all choices are fully innate. Template somewhat confusing about how agents work and so on, versus workload supervisors. As an example, we've had some jobs that work great through SQL Server but fail to use AB, with no justified reason why. Help is usually very effective and fixes problems, but the SQL Server example above confused them a bit. Coaching is very expensive, wish they had more free on board, especially as the first boarded.

PROS: Use and recreate employment opportunities fairly easily once you get familiar. Efficient, with plenty of extra features with other structures, sites, and text editor. Jobs can be planned, prompted, and much more. The organization is consolidated, and it is equally effortless and safe to set up and update.

CONS: To start with a slight learning curve, not all options are completely intuitive. Structure pretty misleading with how operators operate and so on, versus workforce supervisors. As an example, we've had some works that work great via SQL Server but fail to use AB, with no justified reason why. Assist is usually very beneficial and fixes issues, but they were a little confused by the above illustration of the SQL Server example beyond. Coaching is very costly, hope they would have more free on platform, particularly after they first boarded.

PROS: Several of my best things about ActiveBatch are the ability to create custom plans, write custom scripts for programming, and do self-upgrades.

CONS: The Facility to Report left something to be desired. Installing and configuring is a little tedious, and the collection of automated articles is poor.

PROS: I do not witness any potential mistakes after using ActiveBatch. Which, if performed manually, I might well experience.

CONS: At the moment I do use version 11 of ActiveBatch. The one that I despise about this edition is that you can not have the asset window open as well as the work actions accessible at the same moment when you need to see the features of the task.

PROS: The capability to combine tasks/plans with our Data Warehouse jobs from other apps which decreased episodes and enhanced timeliness of data. We use the AB tools to perform processes for Informatica PowerCenter, Tableau, Alteryx, and ICEDQAdmin tasks, and SQL for storage. The skill to conceptually create job addictions is very beneficial.

CONS: The Support features are in my view very minimal. I would like to see many more illustrations with the included AIX / Linux equipment. Often, the integrated documentation may be streamlined.

PROS: I also like the ease of building work with ActiveBatch

CONS: When a work mistakes it might be challenging to find out where the work issue is.

PROS: Numerous different skills to timeline. Information and connections of the process item are kept in a database system that can enable you to incorporate with other instruments, but ActiveBatch does not promote that method. The documents were strongly kept. ActiveBatch people have your documents on the open platform enabling people to use it comfortably, your information doesn't make your product valuable. ActiveBatch software capabilities make it useful!

CONS: ActiveBatch as an Applications Software device which you can use for third party application but this would restrict you to an apps server, operate with obsolete Web technologies and discover that expertise that is usually kept hidden away.

PROS: Using factors in all sorts of situations and triggering several various careers and the manner to prompt them. The greatest picks ever!

CONS: Everything about the special occasion but assistance and illustration on how to do it would be wonderful. Like an institute but cost-free.

PROS: Ability to track jobs in a timely order and not to run a job until another is completed.

CONS: The high availability is somewhat uneven and often needs action to fail back to original. For a single engineer, setting up and keeping work would be a full-time job. I 'd recommend the 'active batch' person becoming a low-level tech. Thus this person becomes more aware of the local work situation while manufacturing the Active batch Jobs.

PROS: We appreciate the fact that most of our planning is in one location and chaining employment together. Also, the fact our OnPrem can prompt employment to finish the sequence on our Cloud example.

CONS: Although coverage is more versatile, this is a small issue.

PROS: Capacity to standardize the work and handle it in a single computer framework. If you can lay out the job, and almost any IT workflow. Simple to use actions in the Job Section. Additionally, waiting systems will operate like a myth to operate the employments in the pool of delays. Lately much developed to be easy to handle device reliability. The event organized will be in the Unix platforms in Windows and investigators. Programs are useful to put the business operation into the simplified process of control which tends to make it simple and fun to identify a load flow.

CONS: While several of the work steps are easily comprehensible, certain variables are not clear in the program in the best career details aid. The skillset ASCI given will need a variant-based filter.

PROS: I like the truths that I understand how pretty stable Successful Batch has become when I can sleep peacefully at night! It's like Automation's iPhone & Swiss Army Knife! If it is electronic then it can be automated by Active Batch! Since 2014, we have used it and it has enabled my organization to grow rapidly and to not stress about increased workflow. Under increased activity, ActiveBatch never bogged down. It just manages whatever we put at it. It is one of the greatest tools we use and it's phenomenally scales! Enhancements too are free of worries!

CONS: There is a great learning experience with ActiveBatch that in the start helps to make it somewhat difficult, but once you understand the basic principles it's like the smartest system is turned on! I can't really come across any despises.

PROS: ActiveBatch is user friendly yet has a lot of skills. I utilize ActiveBatch on a regular basis in my duties doing progress and final extension. I love the Work Steps guide to build work that can simplify the various tasks. The ActiveBatch app for the change process makes it much easier to promote software.

CONS: None of it manages to stand out as a toxic. ActiveBatch does have everything I need for my reasons.

PROS: Ability to standardize the work and manage it in a single software application. If you can create the job, then almost any IT task. Simple to use guidelines in the Job Library. Alternatively, queue systems should function like machines to run the jobs in the pool of queues. Lately much enhanced to be easy to handle device reliability. Task operators can be in the Unix systems in Windows and Agents. Plan's are great to bring the business process into the automated process of monitoring which makes it easy and convenient to spot a flow model.

CONS: While several of the work steps are easily comprehensible, certain criteria are not clear in the program in the work steps definition aid. ASCI's prior knowledge would include a version-based filter.

PROS: Open source, communication humanist software enables us to simplify paper trail and track workers and process flows. Since it is a humanist word, we can exploit jobs that are published in a variety of languages, from python and bash to java and ruby. We can also handle things like responsive game plans, and seize all outcomes in a single place. We were able to rapidly launch new processes in the AWS cloud with ActiveBatch, organize electronic installations, and standardize our day-to-day management operations. By standardizing scheduled jobs from disparate sources into the ActiveBatch atmosphere, we have also been able to budget on the server. By launching deployment entities within each setting, we are able to distinguish employment by minimizing or eliminating bridge-environment traffic, boosting the protection. Since we've had problems where assistance was needed, trigger pullers have been rapidly provided the information to mentor us in the right direction. If that is not enough to fix the dispute, they've been rather effective in giving technical access via screen capture video conferences.

CONS: To run the scheduler software Windows is required. We 're mainly a Linux shop, so running Windows and MSSQL isn't suitable, but spinning on AWS and configuring for ActiveBatch was simple at all. In response, we had to authorize another attribute to operate IIS to support the Web Console for ActiveBatch.The largest producer wasn't easy for us, as we're not fully acquainted with IIS, but we were able to understand the instructions and get things set up relatively fast.

PROS: AB has a lot of functionalities. I have used it for about 1 year now and whenever I doubt if AB can do something, it often sure turned out it is. We use it for optimizing SSIS work, uploading files to SFTP servers, running ensure universal, handling encoding and formatting, and optimizing documentary methods to ensure we don't keep filling operating systems. Overall, I think it's a great tool. You can read about my opinion on the drawbacks in the next question, but in general, if you have a ton of jobs to manage or automate, it's a tool that I would recommend.

CONS: The user interface is a bit eccentric and requires some time to get used to it. Some core elements can be somewhat slow and while assistance is often beneficial, some alternatives make little rational sense. The User interface makes it easy to create up finishing stimuli and strictures for your job or work schedules but getting a complete idea without having to dig into the assets of all your strategies and job opportunities can portray an inaccurate picture (I know this is due to errors in the View-> Map device). Value has recently changed significantly in my institution, but I genuinely don't think it's highly-priced to the point of except the chat.

PROS: Employment, documenting, and other data analytics. We were able to program 95 percent of our evening production so that we could reuse our evening workers to do other repairs. We have not discovered a procedure that couldn't be done by robots using the various types of programs.

CONS: It can be challenging to find any workers on the Regular Activity Computer unless you understand exactly how to handle work.