Inkling Knowledge Review

PROS: Inkling has a credible tracking feature for changes made in a document, which is great to avoid missing anything. It has handy options for managing comments too. This makes Inkling a perfect tool for collaborative tasks.

CONS: There are instances when the editor produces outputs that don’t meet our needs and preferences. This is somehow frustrating for us.

PROS: This is amazing in gathering everybody in our team together. Then, we can finish certain tasks quickly through the tool as well.

CONS: Inkling has a limited design or template options. We cannot fully personalize them and make them fit our needs.

PROS: The UX for developers is very seamless to use, and the tool itself doesn’t demand skilled HTML coders for creating highly engaging content. Inkling smoothly runs on mobile devices too, thus we do not need expert installation staff to do the job. Moreover, it lets us easily limit the library with the use of sharing policies, and it efficiently syncs with LMS through a handy API.

CONS: Its admin dashboard requires tremendous enhancements. Also, one feature that should be included for an upgrade is allowing the export of user information.

PROS: What we like about Inkling is the number of great engagements it can produce. It is also very easy and convenient for developers in our company. Its set of efficient features makes Inkling very functional and useful too.

CONS: Inkling isn’t free from bugs and errors. These often appear through development processes; right in the HTML codes. And it is hard to determine the cause of such errors too, which makes it also difficult to apply solutions.

PROS: It has downloadable options for different platforms, and any versions boast an impressive navigation experience. Its UI is also very responsive, as well as it offers frequent quality updates. Moreover, it makes searching easy for users.

CONS: I’m not satisfied with its support for video uploads. I’ve experienced some considerable limitations when drafting guide outlines too. Thankfully, I’ve found some workarounds with wonderful results while trying to address such limitation problems.

PROS: The advantages that I’ve noticed with Inkling is primarily its ease of use, smooth navigation, quickly runs any content, as well as it produces professional-quality outputs. Inkling is very convenient that we do not need to acquire advanced tech knowledge to use it up. It also lets us efficiently insert copies, videos, images, and quizzes among other contents. Then, we can seamlessly view all the contents through both the web and mobile versions.

CONS: The platform pushes us to use Cyberduck and huge spreadsheets for maintaining the upload and addition of new users to every module. Moreover, users need to browse their device so they can find the Inkling logo, in which they can locate the contents of our company. This is somehow inconvenient for them, thus we hope that Inkling would allow us to use our own logo instead.

PROS: We use Inkling for training for a few years now, and we’ve found it very suitable for our project department. It suits all our employees; both for exempt and non-exempt as well as for corporate and field staff. It promotes quality interaction and is easily accessible through plenty of different devices and OS. Moreover, it helps in updating everybody about project status, processes interactive content for analysis, as well as it helps to decrease our printed outputs in the office. Inkling is really scaling our workflow efficiently.

CONS: Options for organizing the library isn’t efficient for all our departments. It only offers alphabetical arrangement which is somehow making it difficult for us to locate and retrieve certain files. More options would be great for different organizational structures.

PROS: Inkling is efficient in meeting our seasonal training demands as well as the fluctuating traffic that we experience from time to time. This is great in optimizing our processes accordingly, which is something that bigger brands of similar platforms cannot provide.

CONS: Inkling forces all Habitat users to login using a guest account. It would be great if Inkling allows trainees and reviewers to login using a Single Sign-On account, especially when they’re used to such a process.

PROS: Inkling is a great support for us to create and edit high quality contents without unneeded troubles. Then, we can easily distribute such content to the field level instantly.

CONS: The admin panel isn’t that easy to use in terms of handling users. This includes handling active and retired users, as well as the files that they have received.

PROS: My experience with using Inkling is great! It lets me create libraries easily, then users can access its contents anytime as well. I use it for creating different content without expert assistance. And I can share such content internationally for others to translate.

CONS: Engagements are insufficient on Inkling. On the admin panel, it is difficult for us to monitor user productivity as well. This is mainly because our business model doesn’t support login options for the users.

PROS: I and my students love Inkling because it is very functional in accessing the PLTW. We can run it on Chromebook and iPad among other devices too, thus we experience little to no compatibility issues with what devices we have.

CONS: It doesn’t offer a feature that allows me to read the PLTW curriculum to the class. That should be a great addition to the tool.